Now that course of action is not something I’m in favour of.
I regularly consume drugs of all manners. I’ve been a regular consumer of many drugs for most of my adult life, over 10 years or so now. I've chosen to subject myself to alcohol, nicotine (on and off) and caffine among other drugs, and continue to do so. The directive in the title of the post does however seem to be a sound, reasonable and entirely logical extension of the argument I get from most people who I talk to about the prohibition of certain drugs by law. Of course this perfectly logical extension of their argument is wholly unpalatable to a vast majority of the argument’s purveyors.
I would (genuinely) love to hear a rational, lucid and coherent argument from someone that alcohol and its stablemate legal drugs should remain sanctioned for use under the law while others drugs, cannabis for example are prohibited. My position does also advocate the legalisation of all drugs including those classed as ‘hard’. Given the emotion that usually clouds debate on the topic, cannabis (as an example in the debate, not as a prescription to the debaters!) helps steer the debate away from the emotive rocks that can shipwreck it compared to a word like
heroin. This debate is something that I would have had a cursory interest in ever since I became a user of drugs such as alcohol, but it’s something which has interested me more and more in the past year or two.
I can attribute this increased interest in the topic to a number of events in the recent past. Firstly, a quite unsavoury event was visited upon someone close to me by someone involved in the trade of prohibited drugs. This is the kind of person whose existence and ability to flout the law seemingly at will is all wrapped up in their financial profit, made largely from recreational users of cannabis, among other prohibited drugs. That is, someone financed largely by people who are no different than me or most of my social circle.
Secondly, the prohibition of certain strains of magic mushrooms last year by a minister following the tragic death of a person which was associated with their use struck me fairly profoundly as something ridiculous in the extreme. This event did promote some limited debate in the national media regarding the prohibition of drugs in general which was something I had craved to see for some time. Unfortunately the quality of most of the debate that I managed to catch was extremely low and disheartening. We all know the kind of emotive reactions the subject provokes in bucket loads. Even a point as simple as the perfectly valid position of being anti-drug use but pro-legalisation of prohibited drugs is a nuance too far for most people I’ve conversed with on the subject or seen commentary from, or at least it’s certainly not a position they would have considered before.
Finally in recent months the increasing prevalence in the media of discourse regarding gangland killings and how to combat them has stunned me by the lack of serious debate regarding the prohibition of drugs and its significant role in the prosperity of gangland Ireland. Commentators and politicians alike gush with the gravest deploration of the situation and put forth their ideas to combat or, stop the press,
beat the problem. Unfortunately an extremely small percentage of this pretentious soul searching and chest beating effort goes into an issue which is central to the problem, namely the prohibition of drugs. In fairness to politicians however I don’t see this as something someone can stick their neck on the line over and gain traction or advancement of the cause. An issue so engrained in society and so fundamental to the balance of the involvement of the state in the choice and autonomy of the individual needs to be tackled in a multi-partisan way. Journalists and the media have however no such defence.
I think it’s reasonable to accept (and widely accepted) that a concept as ostentatious as a war on drugs will never be prosecuted successfully to an end by the criminalisation avenue no more than the current war on terror will be solved by military means. There are far too many complexities underlying such problems. The active damage we are doing as a side effect of this illogical imaginary line where the law sanctions some drugs and prohibits others is phenomenal. People who become dysfunctional because of habitual use of prohibited drugs are stigmatised and incarcerated, whereas people who abuse alcohol or nicotine (with just as destructive consequences for their families and communities, nicotine smoke in a particularly direct manner) and are ill as a result are treated as a healthcare problem. That’s part of the human cost.
What about the economic cost – how much does it cost us to put all those minions of the drug trade in prison for a short spell a few times during their twenties to train them further up the hierarchy of their chosen trade? There are so many facets to this debate I could go on at length with (I’d love to…) but for now, this is enough. My writing today was prompted (it’s been a while coming!) by a cold, impartial and extremely useful hour long debate on the subject which I caught on Tonight with Vincent Brown on Tuesday night, I urge you to listen as it’s a rare gem as far as my experience goes with the topic in the Irish media. I'd also like to tip my hat to the odd mention of the topic I’ve seen from other Irish bloggers over the past year. To my mind vacuums left by the mainstream media are one of the most worthwhile applications our blogging community can be turned to. Worthy reading can be found by:
Graham Ó Maonaigh [Labour Youth] -
Ending Gun crime requires a ‘harm reduction’ approach to drug use The Swearing Lady -
Where do you get your smoke from?The Quiet Road -
The Madness Of Cannabis ProhibitionLast but most:
Twenty Major -
How to stop the drug related killingsDuring a radio debate around the time of the prohibition of magic mushrooms I did hear one lady advocate the banning of alcohol and tobacco which is at least consistent (if misguided in my opinion) with a policy of prohibiting the currently illegal drugs. She was the only advocate of prohibition that held a position of integrity deserving of respect that I’ve ever heard in this debate. Is it too much to ask that people at least present self-consistent positions on the topic?
So if you can spare the time, have a listen to Vincent Brown’s programme and somebody, please come back to me with an attractive argument on why alcohol should be sanctioned while say, cannabis, is not. Of course any other views or points would be very welcome also.
Tonight With Vincent Brown, Tue 9th Jan 2007.
"Has the war on drugs failed and should we de-criminalise drugs?" [Requires Realplayer] with guests:
Michael Mulcahy - Fianna Fail, Dublin South Central TD
John Mooney - Sunday Times
Tony Geoghan - Director of Merchant's Quay
Rick Lyons - Executive Director of The Irish Penal Reform Trust
Bobby Smith - Child and Adolescent Consultant, Drug Treatment Service Board
Gerry Cameron - Spokesperson for "Law Enforcment Against Prohibition", USA
tags:
drugs
Published by Paul.